What is the status quo of business practice today? And how might one question it? Why is a critique of thestatus quo valuable?
Read professor’s post, and write 2-3 paragraphs reply it. The posts will contain a series of questions and discussion requirements, as well as occasionally some explanation and contextualization. As individuals, however, I do not expect that you will answer every single question that I post. Instead, pick a few questions to reply to that haven’t been answered, or in your view adequately answered or answered in the way that you would answer them, and also respond to, critique, and evaluate the posts of your fellow students.
Thread 2: Continental philosophy and business ethics?
COLLAPSE
You may have noticed that this book is called Business Ethics and Continental Philosophy. The business ethics part of the title should be relatively clear: this book will in some way involve the application of ethical thought to business practice. But what is continental philosophy and why did your professor pick this book as opposed to other books that don’t concern themselves with continental philosophy?
As the book explains, continental philosophy primarily refers to philosophy coming from Continental Europe (mainly France and Germany). This distinguishes it from analytic philosophy, which is primarily represented by English speaking countries. Also, the distinction between analytic philosophy and continental philosophy is a development of Western philosophy during the 20th century. So not only has the analytic/continental distinction not always existed, but it is not relevant to non-western philosophical traditions (so, for example, if you are a philosopher in the Confucian tradition, the analytic/continental tradition is perhaps of no importance to you). To further complicate this issue, many people in English speaking countries do continental philosophy and many people in France and Germany identify themselves as analytic philosophers.
In terms of content and style, there are some significant distinctions between the two traditions. Analytic philosophy is closely allied with modern science, and sees itself as either a science in its own right or as performing services in the name of science such as eliminating fuzzy concepts and reframing problems in such a way that they become amenable to scientific investigation. The relation of analytic philosophy to the history of philosophy is also analogous to how science relates itself to its own history; just as no physicist trying to determine the properties of the Higgs boson would think that a thorough understanding of the history of science, starting with Aristotle and running on up to Peter Higgs and beyond, is relevant to solving this problem, in analytic philosophy an understanding of the history of philosophy is not understood to be relevant to addressing contemporary philosophical problems. Analytic philosophy also views itself as valuing clarity and logical precision above all else when it comes to how one expresses oneself as a philosopher. In contrast, continental philosophy has a greater affinity with literature and the arts, is often more experimental and literary and thus challenging in its manner of expression, and is much more engaged with its own history in its attempts to elucidate and explore contemporary philosophical problems.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING HOMEWORK HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
